|
|
|
by the Center for Watershed Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
Why watershed plans often fail |
|
Eight steps to preparing a watershed plan |
|
Develop a baseline |
|
Select a management structure |
|
Determine budget resources |
|
Project future imperviousness |
|
Set plan goals |
|
Develop watershed and subwatershed goals |
|
Adopt and implement plans |
|
Revisit and update plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scientifically Credible |
|
Locally Based |
|
Democratic |
|
Inclusive |
|
Effective |
|
Adaptable |
|
Economically Defensible |
|
Inexpensive to Prepare |
|
Rapid |
|
|
|
|
Conducted at too great a scale |
|
One-time “study” rather than a continuous cycle |
|
Lacks local ownership and key stakeholder
involvement |
|
Does not address significance of land use change |
|
Budget for watershed plan insufficient |
|
|
|
|
Focuses on watershed analysis tools instead of
management outcome |
|
Document too long or complex |
|
Does not assess adequacy of existing local
program |
|
Plan recommendations are too general |
|
No regulation or requirement mandating the use
of the plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Step 1 -
Develop Baseline |
|
Step 2 -
Select Management Structure |
|
Step 3 -
Determine Budget Resources |
|
Step 4 -
Project Future Imperviousness |
|
Step 5 -
Set Plan Goals |
|
Step 6 -
Develop Watershed and Subwatershed Plans |
|
Step 7 -
Adopt and Implement Plans |
|
Step 8 -
Revise and Update Plans |
|
|
|
|
Define Watershed and Subwatershed Boundaries |
|
Identify Stakeholders |
|
Measure Existing Impervious Cover |
|
Assemble Historical Monitoring Data |
|
Assess Existing Mapping Resources |
|
Assess Local Watershed Protection Capability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Define the origin point (lowest point) |
|
Identify points of maximum elevation from the
stream channel (breakpoints) |
|
Connect breakpoints while crossing contour lines
at right angles |
|
Check that the delineated area drains to stream |
|
Measure subwatershed area |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Governmental |
|
Citizens |
|
Developers |
|
Consultants |
|
Environmentalists |
|
Industry |
|
Non-Profits / Watershed Organizations |
|
Government |
|
Local |
|
State |
|
Federal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serves to classify subwatersheds |
|
Provides an estimate of current watershed
conditions |
|
Aids in setting realistic goals |
|
Guides decision making |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods |
|
Direct Measurement |
|
Land Use |
|
Road Density |
|
Population |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resources |
|
GIS System |
|
Aerial Photos |
|
Zoning Maps |
|
Street Maps |
|
Census Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May reduce cost of baseline monitoring |
|
Can help relate past land use changes to resource condition |
|
Establishes benchmarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topography |
|
Natural Resources |
|
Road/Transportation Network |
|
Geology/Soils |
|
Land Use and Zoning |
|
Floodplains |
|
Current Watershed Management Elements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Master Planning |
|
Zoning Ordinances |
|
Development Review Process |
|
Environmental Protection Regulations |
|
SWM Regulations/Criteria |
|
Program Resources (staff, budget, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Functions of a Typical Watershed Management
Structure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technique: |
|
Land Use |
|
Population Density |
|
Source: |
|
Master Plans |
|
Comprehensive Plans |
|
Adopted Zoning Maps |
|
Water and Sewer Service Projections |
|
Census Records/Forecasts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Achievable |
|
Appropriate |
|
Realistic |
|
Affordable |
|
Practical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Task 5.1- Interpret Goals at the Basin and
Sub-basin levels |
|
Task 5.2- Develop Specific Watershed Goals and
Objectives |
|
Task 5.3- Develop Specific Subwatershed
Management Objectives |
|
Task 5.4- Determine if Objectives Can Be Met
With Existing
Zoning |
|
Task 5.5- Determine Whether Land Use Patterns
Need to Be Shifted Among Subwatersheds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pollutant Load Reduction |
|
Wildlife Migration |
|
Greenways |
|
Flood Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watershed level goals: |
|
Maintain/increase aquatic diversity |
|
Reduce sediment loading |
|
Create/maintain connected buffer system |
|
Protect floodplains from development |
|
Promote public awareness |
|
Accommodate economic development |
|
|
|
|
Reduce channel erosion |
|
Reduce pollutant loads |
|
Protect existing utilities stream erosion damage |
|
Protect existing forest areas and wetlands |
|
Protect existing active recreational areas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are the watershed goals achievable given the
current land use criteria? |
|
Classify subwatersheds based on current and
future impervious cover |
|
Assess the ability of current zoning to support
subwatershed goals |
|
Develop specific management strategies for
subwatersheds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upgrade Zoning in Subwatersheds Designated to
Accommodate Growth |
|
Downgrade Zoning in Subwatersheds That Exceed
Their Target Impervious Cover |
|
Implement Strategies to Reduce Impervious Cover
at the Site or Catchment Level |
|
|
|
|
Watershed Based Zoning |
|
Overlay Zoning |
|
Impervious Cap |
|
Floating Zoning |
|
Incentive Zoning |
|
Performance Zoning |
|
Growth Boundaries |
|
Large Lot Zoning |
|
Infill/Redevelopment |
|
Transferable Development Rights |
|
Limiting Infrastructure Extensions |
|
|
|
|
Task 6.1- Select Watershed Indicators |
|
Task 6.2- Where Needed Conduct
Watershed- Wide and
Special Analyses |
|
Task 6.3- Prepare Subwatershed and Aquatic Corridor
Management Maps |
|
Task 6.4- Apply Other Watershed Protection Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline monitoring can overwhelm budget |
|
Focus on environmental indicators of change |
|
Stormwater chemistry is already well understood |
|
Selection of long-term monitoring stations is
necessary |
|
Physical and biological monitoring surveys must
be repeatable |
|
Management driven monitoring is important |
|
Land use/impervious cover relationship tracking |
|
Public attitude/behavior surveys |
|
Watershed management record keeping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subwatershed Analyses |
|
Stormwater Outfall Inventory |
|
Detailed Wetland Delineation |
|
Septic System Survey |
|
BMP Performance Monitoring |
|
Stormwater Retrofit Survey |
|
Bacteria Source Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
Watershed Analyses |
|
Flood Management Analysis |
|
Pollutant Load Analysis |
|
Greenway Study |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conservation area mapping |
|
Fishery and habitat sampling |
|
Riparian conditions inventory |
|
Stream reconnaisance survey |
|
EPA rapid bioassessment |
|
BMP performance monitoring |
|
Bacteria source surveys |
|
Stormwater outfall survey |
|
Mapping of permeable soils |
|
Detailed wetland delineation |
|
Floodplain modeling |
|
Pollutant load modeling |
|
Pollution prevention survey |
|
Nutrient budget calculations |
|
Survey of potential contaminant sources |
|
Sanitary sewer overflow studies |
|
Hazardous materials survey |
|
Septic system survey |
|
Stormwater retrofit survey |
|
Shoreline littoral survey |
|
lake simulation monitoring |
|
In-lake monitoring |
|
Recreational use survey |
|
Wellhead protection and recharge analysis |
|
Hydro-geologic studies |
|
Analysis of groundwater resources |
|
Groundwater quality studies |
|
|
|
|
Subwatershed Map |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Fits on one sheet |
|
Shows entire subwatershed |
|
Shows subwatershed in relation to watershed |
|
Aquatic Corridor Map |
|
Finer scale |
|
Highly detailed |
|
Only represents area adjacent to stream |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watershed Planning |
|
Land Conservation |
|
Aquatic Buffers |
|
Better Site Design |
|
Erosion and Sediment Control |
|
Stormwater Best Management Practices |
|
Non-Stormwater Discharges |
|
Watershed Stewardship Programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporate the stakeholders |
|
Realistically assess budget resources |
|
Make sure plan is scientifically and
economically sound |
|
Mandate its use in the development process |
|
Ensure that local agencies have sufficient
authority and resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Should be the start of an ongoing management
process |
|
Should be revisited on a regular 5-7 year cycle |
|
Land use and resource monitoring provide plan
update and feedback |
|
Each iteration of the plan should take one year
or less |
|
|
|